Correlation of serum IgG antibodies to recombinant P0 fusion protein with IgG antibodies to carboxylterminal 22 synthetic peptides and carboxyl-terminal 22 amino acid-deleted recombinant P0 fusion protein in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1364-1365
Author(s):  
Taku Yoshio ◽  
Jun-Ichi Masuyama ◽  
Seiji Minota ◽  
Masahiro Iwamoto ◽  
Akio Mimori ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 605.2-606
Author(s):  
F. Cheldieva ◽  
T. Reshetnyak ◽  
M. Cherkasova ◽  
N. Seredavkina ◽  
A. Lila

Background:The study of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), not included in the Sydney diagnostic criteria, in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is poorly understood.Objectives:To determine the frequency of detection of IgA-aCL and IgA-aβ2GP1 and IgG antibodies to β2GP1 domain 1 (IgG-aβ2GP1-D1) in patients with APS with and without SLE.Methods:ELISA and chemiluminescence assays (CMA) were used to test 63 sera of patients: 22 (35%) with primary APS (pAPS) and 41 (65%) patients with APS and with SLE (secondary APS (sAPS)), with mean age 38,0 [33,0 – 43,0] years and disease duration 4,0 [0,1 – 9,9]. Both methods were used to test of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1. CMA was used for research IgG/IgM/IgA-aCL, IgG/IgM/IgA-aβ2GPI and IgG-aβ2GP1-D1. Of them 49 (78%) (18 – with pAPS; 31 – with sAPS) displayed major thrombotic events and 18 of 22 pregnant women had pregnancy morbidity in past history. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity was in 9 out of 12 patients who had it determined. LA was not investigated due to anticoagulant therapy in the remaining 52 patients.Results:IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aß2GP1 were recorded in 44/18 and 50/17 patients by ELISA and in 55/19 and 59/16 by CMA, respectively.IgA-aCL positivity was found in 35 (56%) of 63 patients. Thirty IgA-positive patients were positive for IgG-aCL by ELISA: 22 – IgG-aCL – highly positive, 6 – medium positive and 2 – low positive patients. IgM-aCL by ELISA was detected in 13 (37%) of 35 IgA-aCL positive patients: 11 – highly positive, 1 – medium positive and 1 – low positive. IgA-aCL was combined with IgG-aCL in 34 patients and with IgM-aCL in 16 patients in the CMA. IgG-aß2GP1 in ELISA was detected in 32 patients with IgA-aCL (24 –highly positive, 5 – medium positive and 3 – low positive) and in 34 – in CMA. IgM-aß2GP1 was combined with IgA-aß2GP1 with the same frequency in both methods (in 13 patients).IgA-aß2GP1 was detected in 30 (48%) of 63 patients. They were combined with both IgG-aCL and IgG-aß2GP1 in all cases in both methods. IgM-aCL and IgM-aß2GP1 were detected in 14 and 11 of 30 patients with IgA-aß2GP1, respectively. The combination of IgA-aß2GP1 with IgG-aCL by ELISA was in 27 (in most cases highly positive – 20) and with IgM-aCL – in 10 (highly positive - 8). IgG-aß2GP1 was detected in 28 patients with IgA-aß2GP1 (high positive – 21) and in 11 patients with IgM-aß2GP1 (high positive –7).IgG-aß2GP1-D1 was revealed in 48 (76%) patients. It was combined with IgG-aCL – in 38, with IgM-aCL – in 15 patients by the ELISA. The combination of IgG-aß2GP1-D1 by CMA was as follows: with IgG-aCL – in 46, with IgM-aCL – in 17, and with IgA-aCL – in 33 patients. In most cases, IgG-aß2gp1-D1 was combined with highly positive aCL levels. IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was associated with IgG-aß2GP1 positivity in 42 – by ELISA and 47 – by CMA, IgМ-aβ2GP1 – in 13 and 14 patients by ELISA and CMA, respectively, and IgA-aß2GP1 – in 29. Isolated IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was not observed.Conclusion:The frequency of IgA-aCL detection was 56% (35 patients out of 63), IgA-aβ2GP1 – 48% (30 patients out of 63), IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 – 76% (48 patients out of 63). There was not isolated positivity of this “extra” criterial antibodies. The presence of IgA-aCL, IgA-aβ2GP1, IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 was associated with highly positivity of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM- aβ2GP1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2002 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ol'ga A. Andrievskaya ◽  
Valentina N. Buneva ◽  
Andrey G. Baranovskii ◽  
Anastasiya V. Gal'vita ◽  
Elena S. Benzo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sonia L La’ulu ◽  
Brenda B Suh-Lailam ◽  
K Wayne Davis ◽  
Joely A Straseski ◽  
Anne E Tebo

Background Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious complications of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study evaluates the prevalence and correlation between neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and other biomarkers associated with renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods Paired serum and urine specimens from 50 suspected systemic lupus erythematosus patients, characterized by antinuclear antibodies detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay and varying positive concentrations of anti-double stranded DNA antibodies by Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence assay, were investigated. Of these 50 patients, 18 were identified with renal involvement based upon laboratory serology. Patients and healthy control serum samples ( n = 50) were also evaluated for high avidity double stranded DNA IgG antibodies, anti-C1q IgG antibodies, and serum creatinine. The prevalence and relationship between biomarkers were evaluated using statistical methods. Results Serum and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations were significantly elevated in patients compared to controls, with a prevalence of 24% and 36%, respectively. These concentrations were also more markedly increased in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with renal involvement than those without. Spearman’s correlations between neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and other biomarkers tested ranged from 0.06 to 0.66 in all patients. Combined concordance as determined by Cronbach alpha coefficient between biomarkers was reduced from 0.71 to 0.58 (serum) and 0.62 (urine) when neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was removed. Conclusions Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations are elevated and demonstrate variable associated with other laboratory markers for renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to determine the optimal biomarker combinations for use in routine management of systemic lupus erythematosus patients at-risk for lupus nephritis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Zeng ◽  
Ling Zheng ◽  
Hongbing Rui ◽  
Rihui Kang ◽  
Junmin Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To explore the risk factors for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flare and their impact on prognosis. Methods The clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and treatment plans of 121 patients with SLE flare were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-eight SLE outpatients with sustained remission during the same period were selected as controls. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was employed to screen for risk factors for SLE flare. Results Infection, thrombocytopenia, arthritis, anti-nucleosome antibodies positive, anti-β2-glycoprotein I (IgG) antibodies positive, and patient’s self-discontinuation of medicine maintenance therapy might be risk factors for SLE flare. Patients who discontinued medicine maintenance therapy by themselves had a significantly higher rate of severe SLE flare than patients with regular medicine maintenance therapy (P = 0.033). The incidence of anemia associated with SLE (P = 0.001), serositis (P = 0.005), and pulmonary hypertension (P = 0.003) in patients who discontinued medicine maintenance therapy were significantly higher than patients with regular medicine maintenance therapy. SLE patients with regular medicine maintenance therapy for less than 3 years had a higher risk of pulmonary hypertension than those with regular medicine maintenance therapy longer than 3 years (P = 0.034). Conclusions The accompanying thrombocytopenia, arthritis, anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (IgG) antibodies positive at the onset of SLE may affect the prognosis of SLE. Patient’s self-discontinuation of medicine maintenance therapy is the main cause of SLE flare, which may induce severe flare in SLE patients and lead to a significantly higher incidence of pulmonary hypertension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document